Political Science: stances in move 3

Stances in 'Introduction': Political Science - Introduction 3 - Move 3

(1) Select an 'Introduction' (2) Select a move in that 'Introduction' (What is this?)

Learning Objectives & Strategies:
Explore stances used (A) to make move (B) to support move-making in Move 3
1. Understand what the 3 moves are? ('Introduction' & 3 Moves).
2. Look at the sentences that make move and the stances used.
3. Look at the supporting sentences and the stances used.
4. Compare why supporting sentences are differnt from move-making sentences.
5. Check out the ratios of stances used (A) to make move only & (B) overall in Move 3.

Title: The Cartoon Controversy: Offence, Identity, Oppression?
Author(s): Sune Lagaard
Journal: Political Studies 55?(3).

ause

Making Move?
(Y/N)

Stances

Move 3, "Present the present work ," Introduction 3 (*green = Stance Keywords)

(Y) Announcing present research purposively

Non Argumentative

The article addresses these issues via a discussion of what was normatively at stake in the Rushdie affair, i.e. freedom of expression and toleration.

(N) elaborate on C10

Non Argumentative: to state fact

The reason for drawing on discussions of the Rushdie affair is that

11.1

(N) elaborate on C10

High Argumentative: to proclaim

(a) the two cases are very similar in most of the relevant respects;

11.2

(N) elaborate on C10

Med Argumentative: to suggest high amount of

(b) most of the critical discussion has been framed very much like those used in discussions of the Rushdie affair;

11.3

(N) elaborate on C10

Non Argumentative: to state fact

and (c) the cartoon controversy has to date not received much systematic theoretical treatment comparable to the treatments of the Rushdie affair considered here.

(Y) Suggesting findings

Tentative

The article suggests that

12.1

(N) support C12

Med Argumentative: to suggest high possibility

a liberal model of toleration which gives a high priority to freedom of expression and toleration can acknowledge several of the moral reasons as legitimate against publication.

(N) support C12

High Argumentative: to counter

Although some of the complaints against the publication may be genuine and legitimate from a liberal point of view,

13.1

(N) support C12

Tentative: to suggest some tendency

they are generally not sufficient to justify legal restrictions on freedom of expression.

(N) support C12

Tentative: to suggest some possibility

There might, however, be problematic features beyond those that can be thus acknowledged

14.1

(N) support C12

Non Argumentative: to state fact

and it is considered under what conditions one such feature might justify legal restrictions on freedom of expression.